https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87524 Pre-deposit directions were modified in light of a detention order that prevented clearance of goods, but the plea of financial hardship was not substantiated because the claimed rehabilitation scheme was not produced. The authority accepted that the detention order had affected operations and therefore allowed payment by instalments. The appellants were permitted to pay Rs. 5,00,000 each month, with the first instalment due on 7-5-1997, and the detention order was to cease once that first instalment was paid. en-us Wed, 16 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:41:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87524 Pre-deposit directions were modified in light of a detention order that prevented clearance of goods, but the plea of financial hardship was not substantiated because the claimed rehabilitation scheme was not produced. The authority accepted that the detention order had affected operations and therefore allowed payment by instalments. The appellants were permitted to pay Rs. 5,00,000 each month, with the first instalment due on 7-5-1997, and the detention order was to cease once that first instalment was paid. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 16 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87524