<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (2) TMI 293 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87511</link>
    <description>Interest charged separately for delayed payment was not treated as part of the sale price where the invoices showed it was recovered after clearance of goods. On those facts, the amount did not enter the assessable value under Section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, because it was not collected as consideration for the goods themselves. The impugned orders were set aside and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:14:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (2) TMI 293 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87511</link>
      <description>Interest charged separately for delayed payment was not treated as part of the sale price where the invoices showed it was recovered after clearance of goods. On those facts, the amount did not enter the assessable value under Section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, because it was not collected as consideration for the goods themselves. The impugned orders were set aside and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87511</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>