https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87469 Modvat credit could not be denied solely for absence of a formal Rule 57G declaration where the assessee had disclosed the final product in the classification list and obtained departmental permission under Rule 57F(2). Those records showed that the department knew the inputs, the final product, and the intended manufacturing process, so the declaration requirement was substantially complied with. Credit was therefore admissible and the denial was set aside. en-us Tue, 02 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Sep 2011 12:07:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87469 Modvat credit could not be denied solely for absence of a formal Rule 57G declaration where the assessee had disclosed the final product in the classification list and obtained departmental permission under Rule 57F(2). Those records showed that the department knew the inputs, the final product, and the intended manufacturing process, so the declaration requirement was substantially complied with. Credit was therefore admissible and the denial was set aside. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 02 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87469