<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (11) TMI 178 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87462</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal, comprising Ms. Jyoti Balasundaram and Shri J.H. Joglekar, upheld the order of the Principal Collector, thereby rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The decision was based on the acceptance of the classification under Chapter 30 and the unchallenged findings on the time bar. The Tribunal&#039;s ruling favored the respondents, concluding the legal dispute over the classification and duty demand related to &quot;Foot Powder&quot; for the specified period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 11:59:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (11) TMI 178 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87462</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal, comprising Ms. Jyoti Balasundaram and Shri J.H. Joglekar, upheld the order of the Principal Collector, thereby rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The decision was based on the acceptance of the classification under Chapter 30 and the unchallenged findings on the time bar. The Tribunal&#039;s ruling favored the respondents, concluding the legal dispute over the classification and duty demand related to &quot;Foot Powder&quot; for the specified period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>