<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (11) TMI 176 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87460</link>
    <description>Bleached sheeting fabrics that were open-weave, heavily sized with starch, gum and inorganic fillers, and lost stiffness after hot-water treatment were held not to be impregnated or coated fabrics because the interstices between yarns remained open and the stiffness was not permanent. On that basis, the goods were classified under Heading 52.06 rather than Heading 59.01 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, following earlier Tribunal decisions on identical facts. The appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 11:51:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124527" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (11) TMI 176 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87460</link>
      <description>Bleached sheeting fabrics that were open-weave, heavily sized with starch, gum and inorganic fillers, and lost stiffness after hot-water treatment were held not to be impregnated or coated fabrics because the interstices between yarns remained open and the stiffness was not permanent. On that basis, the goods were classified under Heading 52.06 rather than Heading 59.01 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, following earlier Tribunal decisions on identical facts. The appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>