<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (11) TMI 159 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87443</link>
    <description>Cash discount allowed to dealers for payment in cash or by demand draft was deductible from assessable value where the discount was known to trade and available to all qualifying buyers. The fact that some buyers did not actually avail the discount did not justify denial of the deduction, because the discount remained part of the established pricing structure. On that basis, deduction of the cash discount was held allowable and the department&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 10:53:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (11) TMI 159 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87443</link>
      <description>Cash discount allowed to dealers for payment in cash or by demand draft was deductible from assessable value where the discount was known to trade and available to all qualifying buyers. The fact that some buyers did not actually avail the discount did not justify denial of the deduction, because the discount remained part of the established pricing structure. On that basis, deduction of the cash discount was held allowable and the department&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>