<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (10) TMI 162 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87435</link>
    <description>The appeal involved a dispute over the import of Star Aniseed, previously categorized as a crude drug. The Collector of Customs imposed a fine and penalty for violating Customs Act provisions. The Judge upheld the fine and penalty, emphasizing the updated import policy&#039;s requirement for specific medicinal purposes, dismissing arguments based on past practices and legal precedents. The judgment focused on the current policy&#039;s relevance, considering the fine and penalty proportionate to the goods&#039; value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 10:32:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (10) TMI 162 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87435</link>
      <description>The appeal involved a dispute over the import of Star Aniseed, previously categorized as a crude drug. The Collector of Customs imposed a fine and penalty for violating Customs Act provisions. The Judge upheld the fine and penalty, emphasizing the updated import policy&#039;s requirement for specific medicinal purposes, dismissing arguments based on past practices and legal precedents. The judgment focused on the current policy&#039;s relevance, considering the fine and penalty proportionate to the goods&#039; value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>