<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (9) TMI 248 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87409</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal regarding the classification of imported equipment under Tariff Heading 84.59(1) or 84.59(2). It instructed the Assistant Collector to review the pending refund claim on its merits, ensuring proper disposal and consideration of the appellant&#039;s arguments for reclassification under Tariff Heading 84.59(2.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 17:28:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (9) TMI 248 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87409</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal regarding the classification of imported equipment under Tariff Heading 84.59(1) or 84.59(2). It instructed the Assistant Collector to review the pending refund claim on its merits, ensuring proper disposal and consideration of the appellant&#039;s arguments for reclassification under Tariff Heading 84.59(2.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>