<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (8) TMI 233 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87394</link>
    <description>On a prima facie review of valuation disputes concerning the PTA plant, paraxylene plant, third-list items and know-how fees, arguable questions were found on the valuation methodology, alleged departure from the notice and denial of opportunity. Those issues supported interim protection, but the material was not sufficient to justify a full waiver of pre-deposit at the appeal stage. Complete waiver was therefore refused, while partial relief was granted by directing a deposit and staying recovery of the balance on compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 16:56:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (8) TMI 233 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87394</link>
      <description>On a prima facie review of valuation disputes concerning the PTA plant, paraxylene plant, third-list items and know-how fees, arguable questions were found on the valuation methodology, alleged departure from the notice and denial of opportunity. Those issues supported interim protection, but the material was not sufficient to justify a full waiver of pre-deposit at the appeal stage. Complete waiver was therefore refused, while partial relief was granted by directing a deposit and staying recovery of the balance on compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>