https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87388 The judgment concluded that the appellant was entitled to describe the goods as artificial fur cloth, overturning the impugned order and allowing the appeal. The decision emphasized the lack of specific criteria for pile length in defining fur cloth and highlighted the subjective nature of the Chemical Examiner's opinion, which the Additional Collector had relied upon without proper justification. en-us Wed, 13 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Sep 2011 16:33:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87388 The judgment concluded that the appellant was entitled to describe the goods as artificial fur cloth, overturning the impugned order and allowing the appeal. The decision emphasized the lack of specific criteria for pile length in defining fur cloth and highlighted the subjective nature of the Chemical Examiner's opinion, which the Additional Collector had relied upon without proper justification. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 13 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87388