<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (8) TMI 217 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87378</link>
    <description>The Adjudicating Officer concluded that an Adjudicating Officer does not have the authority to review his own order and issue a fresh Show Cause Notice for the recovery of a refund previously adjudicated by him. The Officer emphasized that the proper remedy in such cases was for a higher authority to examine the legality of the decision. As a result, the Department&#039;s appeal was rejected as the Adjudicating Officer found no legal flaws in the Collector (Appeals)&#039;s decision to sanction the refund to the Respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 15:46:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (8) TMI 217 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87378</link>
      <description>The Adjudicating Officer concluded that an Adjudicating Officer does not have the authority to review his own order and issue a fresh Show Cause Notice for the recovery of a refund previously adjudicated by him. The Officer emphasized that the proper remedy in such cases was for a higher authority to examine the legality of the decision. As a result, the Department&#039;s appeal was rejected as the Adjudicating Officer found no legal flaws in the Collector (Appeals)&#039;s decision to sanction the refund to the Respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>