<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (7) TMI 366 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87374</link>
    <description>Revenue&#039;s challenge to the reassessment of spares for a numerical control panel under Customs Tariff Heading 8538.90 did not proceed because the Department failed to serve notice on the respondent despite repeated directions. The record shows that the appellate authority had treated the goods as parts of the numerical control panel and had directed reassessment accordingly. As service remained unreported, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for non-prosecution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 15:42:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (7) TMI 366 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87374</link>
      <description>Revenue&#039;s challenge to the reassessment of spares for a numerical control panel under Customs Tariff Heading 8538.90 did not proceed because the Department failed to serve notice on the respondent despite repeated directions. The record shows that the appellate authority had treated the goods as parts of the numerical control panel and had directed reassessment accordingly. As service remained unreported, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for non-prosecution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87374</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>