<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 251 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87343</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi, ruled on the classification of imported aluminum tubes, determining they should be classified as aluminum tubes under CTH 7608.10 rather than as parts of a photocopier machine under CTH 9009.90. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of selenium coating in imparting essential characteristics for photocopying machinery, stating that the goods did not acquire the essential character of finished products until undergoing selenium coating. Therefore, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue Appeal and upheld the classification of the goods as aluminum tubes, not parts of a photocopier machine.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 13:33:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124410" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 251 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87343</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi, ruled on the classification of imported aluminum tubes, determining they should be classified as aluminum tubes under CTH 7608.10 rather than as parts of a photocopier machine under CTH 9009.90. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of selenium coating in imparting essential characteristics for photocopying machinery, stating that the goods did not acquire the essential character of finished products until undergoing selenium coating. Therefore, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue Appeal and upheld the classification of the goods as aluminum tubes, not parts of a photocopier machine.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>