<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (1) TMI 288 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87338</link>
    <description>Thermocol blocks and sheets, including goods cut and trimmed to customer requirements, were treated as classifiable under Chapter 39 by Chapter Note 10. The 11C exemption notifications were read together because they were beneficial, related to a past period, and the later amendment removed the earlier restrictive wording. On that construction, the relief extended to the goods and the period in dispute, so the duty demand could not be enforced and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 13:20:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (1) TMI 288 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87338</link>
      <description>Thermocol blocks and sheets, including goods cut and trimmed to customer requirements, were treated as classifiable under Chapter 39 by Chapter Note 10. The 11C exemption notifications were read together because they were beneficial, related to a past period, and the later amendment removed the earlier restrictive wording. On that construction, the relief extended to the goods and the period in dispute, so the duty demand could not be enforced and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>