<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (9) TMI 197 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87269</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the imposition of redemption fines on imported goods in a case involving appeals from an importer and the Collector of Customs. The importer claimed completion of export obligations but was still subject to the redemption fine by the adjudicating authority. Despite allegations of denial of natural justice and concerns over market price determination, the Tribunal found in favor of upholding the redemption fine, citing the lack of evidence on prevailing market prices. The issue of penalty imposition was deemed unnecessary as the adjudicating authority had kept penal actions in abeyance, leading to the dismissal of the appeals without interference with the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 18:00:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (9) TMI 197 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87269</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the imposition of redemption fines on imported goods in a case involving appeals from an importer and the Collector of Customs. The importer claimed completion of export obligations but was still subject to the redemption fine by the adjudicating authority. Despite allegations of denial of natural justice and concerns over market price determination, the Tribunal found in favor of upholding the redemption fine, citing the lack of evidence on prevailing market prices. The issue of penalty imposition was deemed unnecessary as the adjudicating authority had kept penal actions in abeyance, leading to the dismissal of the appeals without interference with the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>