<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (9) TMI 196 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87268</link>
    <description>The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi arose from a dispute regarding the refund of excise duty claimed under Notification No. 130/83. The central issue was whether the duty paid in excess, despite a release order for additional free sale under the notification, was refundable. The Tribunal found that the lower authorities had not adequately assessed the appellants&#039; entitlement under the notification and the impact of unjust enrichment. Consequently, the matter was remanded for further examination by the Assistant Commissioner to determine eligibility for a refund and assess unjust enrichment in accordance with recent case law. The appeal was allowed for further clarification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 17:56:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (9) TMI 196 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87268</link>
      <description>The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi arose from a dispute regarding the refund of excise duty claimed under Notification No. 130/83. The central issue was whether the duty paid in excess, despite a release order for additional free sale under the notification, was refundable. The Tribunal found that the lower authorities had not adequately assessed the appellants&#039; entitlement under the notification and the impact of unjust enrichment. Consequently, the matter was remanded for further examination by the Assistant Commissioner to determine eligibility for a refund and assess unjust enrichment in accordance with recent case law. The appeal was allowed for further clarification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>