<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (9) TMI 194 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87266</link>
    <description>Wiring harness, cable harness and handle bar harness made from cut wires and cables fitted with connectors were held classifiable under sub-heading 8544.00 because the tariff entry for insulated wires and cables covered goods whether or not fitted with connectors, and the specific heading prevailed over a parts-and-accessories description. The process of assembling wires and cables into harnesses amounted to manufacture because it produced a distinct commercial commodity with a different name, character and use, even though the input and final product remained within the same tariff heading. For limitation, the later-period differential duty demand was sustainable after final assessment, while the earlier period remained time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 17:50:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (9) TMI 194 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87266</link>
      <description>Wiring harness, cable harness and handle bar harness made from cut wires and cables fitted with connectors were held classifiable under sub-heading 8544.00 because the tariff entry for insulated wires and cables covered goods whether or not fitted with connectors, and the specific heading prevailed over a parts-and-accessories description. The process of assembling wires and cables into harnesses amounted to manufacture because it produced a distinct commercial commodity with a different name, character and use, even though the input and final product remained within the same tariff heading. For limitation, the later-period differential duty demand was sustainable after final assessment, while the earlier period remained time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>