<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (8) TMI 194 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87241</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellants, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision based on the discrepancy in the date of shipment. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of precise documentation in import cases and acknowledged the evolving import policy environment. The Tribunal accepted the Appellants&#039; argument regarding the actual date of shipment, refuting the Commissioner&#039;s findings and ultimately allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 16:35:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124308" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (8) TMI 194 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87241</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellants, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision based on the discrepancy in the date of shipment. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of precise documentation in import cases and acknowledged the evolving import policy environment. The Tribunal accepted the Appellants&#039; argument regarding the actual date of shipment, refuting the Commissioner&#039;s findings and ultimately allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>