<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (5) TMI 222 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87158</link>
    <description>An automatic internal cylindrical grinding machine was treated as covered by S. No. 27 of Notification No. 40/78 because the decisive factor was its essential function as an internal grinder for grinding internal grooves or tracks of bearing outer races. Its ability to grind different groove profiles, including cylindrical, radial or special shapes, did not take it outside the entry. The use of different dressers for varying groove profiles did not alter the machine&#039;s character, and the record supported that the imported machine was fitted only with a radial dresser. The denial of exemption was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 11:36:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (5) TMI 222 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87158</link>
      <description>An automatic internal cylindrical grinding machine was treated as covered by S. No. 27 of Notification No. 40/78 because the decisive factor was its essential function as an internal grinder for grinding internal grooves or tracks of bearing outer races. Its ability to grind different groove profiles, including cylindrical, radial or special shapes, did not take it outside the entry. The use of different dressers for varying groove profiles did not alter the machine&#039;s character, and the record supported that the imported machine was fitted only with a radial dresser. The denial of exemption was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>