https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87140 The Tribunal set aside the adjudication order in a case involving an export obligation of a minimum 75% Acrylic Fibre content. Discrepancies in sampling and test reports led to a dispute over the remaining product quantity. The appellants contested the rejection of favorable test reports and lack of re-testing. The Tribunal criticized the handling of test results and ruled in favor of the appellants, emphasizing favorable test results by ICD officers and the absence of container references in reports. The appeal was allowed, citing a Bombay High Court judgment supporting the appellants' case. en-us Fri, 04 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Sep 2011 11:03:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87140 The Tribunal set aside the adjudication order in a case involving an export obligation of a minimum 75% Acrylic Fibre content. Discrepancies in sampling and test reports led to a dispute over the remaining product quantity. The appellants contested the rejection of favorable test reports and lack of re-testing. The Tribunal criticized the handling of test results and ruled in favor of the appellants, emphasizing favorable test results by ICD officers and the absence of container references in reports. The appeal was allowed, citing a Bombay High Court judgment supporting the appellants' case. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 04 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87140