<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (9) TMI 183 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87122</link>
    <description>Optional secondary packing costs were excluded from excise assessable value where wooden crates were supplied only at the buyer&#039;s choice for additional transport protection. The text applies the principle that non-compulsory packing does not form part of the normal wholesale price at the factory gate. On that basis, the value of the crates was not includible in assessable value, and the differential duty demand was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 18:35:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (9) TMI 183 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87122</link>
      <description>Optional secondary packing costs were excluded from excise assessable value where wooden crates were supplied only at the buyer&#039;s choice for additional transport protection. The text applies the principle that non-compulsory packing does not form part of the normal wholesale price at the factory gate. On that basis, the value of the crates was not includible in assessable value, and the differential duty demand was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>