<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (9) TMI 173 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87112</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on glass bottles used for aerated water was treated as admissible where the bottles&#039; cost formed part of the aerated water cost, including rotation charges. Applying the same ratio on stay, the Tribunal held that the assessee had a strong prima facie case and dispensed with pre-deposit of duty and penalty. Recovery was stayed during pendency of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 18:02:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (9) TMI 173 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87112</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on glass bottles used for aerated water was treated as admissible where the bottles&#039; cost formed part of the aerated water cost, including rotation charges. Applying the same ratio on stay, the Tribunal held that the assessee had a strong prima facie case and dispensed with pre-deposit of duty and penalty. Recovery was stayed during pendency of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>