<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (8) TMI 143 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87069</link>
    <description>Man-made fabrics subjected only to calendaring in the same factory remained eligible for exemption under Notification No. 297/79, as amended, because the notification denied relief only where the fabrics were also subjected to any other process in the same factory. The record contained no evidence that any disqualifying process beyond calendaring had been carried out, and the appellate finding that the benefit could be extended subject to verification was not displaced. The departmental challenge therefore failed, and the exemption was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 15:46:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124136" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (8) TMI 143 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87069</link>
      <description>Man-made fabrics subjected only to calendaring in the same factory remained eligible for exemption under Notification No. 297/79, as amended, because the notification denied relief only where the fabrics were also subjected to any other process in the same factory. The record contained no evidence that any disqualifying process beyond calendaring had been carried out, and the appellate finding that the benefit could be extended subject to verification was not displaced. The departmental challenge therefore failed, and the exemption was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>