<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (7) TMI 305 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87057</link>
    <description>Pre-deposit of the penalty amount was waived and recovery was stayed during the pendency of the appeal, addressing interim relief against enforcement while the appeal remained undecided. The operative point was whether the appellant should be required to deposit the penalty before the appeal was heard; the relief granted removed that immediate payment burden and suspended recovery steps until disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 15:13:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (7) TMI 305 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87057</link>
      <description>Pre-deposit of the penalty amount was waived and recovery was stayed during the pendency of the appeal, addressing interim relief against enforcement while the appeal remained undecided. The operative point was whether the appellant should be required to deposit the penalty before the appeal was heard; the relief granted removed that immediate payment burden and suspended recovery steps until disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87057</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>