<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (7) TMI 297 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87049</link>
    <description>On removal of inputs after Modvat credit has been taken, the duty payable is linked to the credit already availed and is not to be re-assessed afresh at the stage of removal. The Tribunal applied the Larger Bench view and confined the duty liability to the Modvat credit earlier utilised. On penalty, it found that bona fides were not established because the irregular removals continued for a long period, but it still reduced the penalty in view of the duty already paid and the overall circumstances, granting partial relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 14:44:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (7) TMI 297 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87049</link>
      <description>On removal of inputs after Modvat credit has been taken, the duty payable is linked to the credit already availed and is not to be re-assessed afresh at the stage of removal. The Tribunal applied the Larger Bench view and confined the duty liability to the Modvat credit earlier utilised. On penalty, it found that bona fides were not established because the irregular removals continued for a long period, but it still reduced the penalty in view of the duty already paid and the overall circumstances, granting partial relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>