<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (6) TMI 179 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87034</link>
    <description>Buyers purchasing through a consignment agent were not treated as a separate class from factory-gate buyers for valuation purposes because no relevant distinguishing factor was shown. As factory-gate price was available, assessable value had to be based on that price, and the higher differential duty collected on the routed sales was unsustainable. The appellant was therefore entitled to refund, the impugned orders were set aside, and the matter was remanded to the jurisdictional adjudicating authority to quantify the refund and decide afresh.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 13:16:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (6) TMI 179 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87034</link>
      <description>Buyers purchasing through a consignment agent were not treated as a separate class from factory-gate buyers for valuation purposes because no relevant distinguishing factor was shown. As factory-gate price was available, assessable value had to be based on that price, and the higher differential duty collected on the routed sales was unsustainable. The appellant was therefore entitled to refund, the impugned orders were set aside, and the matter was remanded to the jurisdictional adjudicating authority to quantify the refund and decide afresh.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>