<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (5) TMI 171 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86961</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Madras, upheld the lower authority&#039;s decision in a case involving the valuation of imported software and penalty for mis-declaration of value. The Tribunal found that the software&#039;s commercial value should be the assessable value under Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962, rejecting the appellant&#039;s argument to split the value between the physical carrier and intellectual property. It affirmed the confiscation of goods, duty demand of Rs. 18,37,784, and a penalty of Rs. 1 Lakh, stating that the Department met its burden of proof and dismissing the appellant&#039;s bona fide belief defense.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:04:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124028" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (5) TMI 171 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86961</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Madras, upheld the lower authority&#039;s decision in a case involving the valuation of imported software and penalty for mis-declaration of value. The Tribunal found that the software&#039;s commercial value should be the assessable value under Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962, rejecting the appellant&#039;s argument to split the value between the physical carrier and intellectual property. It affirmed the confiscation of goods, duty demand of Rs. 18,37,784, and a penalty of Rs. 1 Lakh, stating that the Department met its burden of proof and dismissing the appellant&#039;s bona fide belief defense.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86961</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>