<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (5) TMI 167 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86957</link>
    <description>Imported Machine Interface Programming Units treated as parts of a Horizontal Machining Centre were held eligible for concessional import treatment under Notification No. 179/80-Cus. The notification extended to parts of machines falling within the specified classification heading, and the benefit could not be refused merely because the part itself was argued to fall under a different heading. On the facts noted, the parent Horizontal Machining Centre was classifiable within the covered heading, and the importer had produced the required DGTD certificate. The denial of the notification benefit was accordingly set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:58:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (5) TMI 167 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86957</link>
      <description>Imported Machine Interface Programming Units treated as parts of a Horizontal Machining Centre were held eligible for concessional import treatment under Notification No. 179/80-Cus. The notification extended to parts of machines falling within the specified classification heading, and the benefit could not be refused merely because the part itself was argued to fall under a different heading. On the facts noted, the parent Horizontal Machining Centre was classifiable within the covered heading, and the importer had produced the required DGTD certificate. The denial of the notification benefit was accordingly set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>