<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (5) TMI 154 - CEGAT,  MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86944</link>
    <description>The optional electric motor supplied separately with power-driven pumps was held to be a distinct article and not an integral component of the pump, because it was not built into or mounted with the pump and the combined supply did not meet the HSN Section XVI notes for a single composite machine or integrated entity. On that basis, the motor&#039;s value was excluded from the assessable value of the pumps, and the assessee succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:31:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (5) TMI 154 - CEGAT,  MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86944</link>
      <description>The optional electric motor supplied separately with power-driven pumps was held to be a distinct article and not an integral component of the pump, because it was not built into or mounted with the pump and the combined supply did not meet the HSN Section XVI notes for a single composite machine or integrated entity. On that basis, the motor&#039;s value was excluded from the assessable value of the pumps, and the assessee succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86944</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>