<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (8) TMI 135 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86935</link>
    <description>Penalty pre-deposit was waived and recovery proceedings were stayed where the show cause notice did not allege any specific intent to evade duty, the duty had already been paid voluntarily, and the dispute over the description of the imported goods remained pending. On that basis, a prima facie case was found in favour of the applicant on the penalty issue, justifying interim relief during the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:06:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (8) TMI 135 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86935</link>
      <description>Penalty pre-deposit was waived and recovery proceedings were stayed where the show cause notice did not allege any specific intent to evade duty, the duty had already been paid voluntarily, and the dispute over the description of the imported goods remained pending. On that basis, a prima facie case was found in favour of the applicant on the penalty issue, justifying interim relief during the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>