<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (8) TMI 129 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86929</link>
    <description>The case involved the classification of steel bands under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The tribunal held that the process of cutting and welding steel bands amounted to &quot;manufacture,&quot; triggering duty liability. The extended period of limitation for duty recovery was deemed applicable. The appellants were granted Modvat credit but faced a reduced penalty. The tribunal directed quantification of the demand and relief for the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:59:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (8) TMI 129 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86929</link>
      <description>The case involved the classification of steel bands under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The tribunal held that the process of cutting and welding steel bands amounted to &quot;manufacture,&quot; triggering duty liability. The extended period of limitation for duty recovery was deemed applicable. The appellants were granted Modvat credit but faced a reduced penalty. The tribunal directed quantification of the demand and relief for the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>