<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (7) TMI 281 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86926</link>
    <description>The optional luxury mud-guard seat supplied only on buyers&#039; request was treated as distinct from an essential tractor component because the tractor was complete without it and the seat was not supplied on all tractors before delivery. On that basis, its value was not includible in the assessable value of the tractor, unlike accessories or items supplied as part of the standard vehicle equipment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:56:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123993" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (7) TMI 281 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86926</link>
      <description>The optional luxury mud-guard seat supplied only on buyers&#039; request was treated as distinct from an essential tractor component because the tractor was complete without it and the seat was not supplied on all tractors before delivery. On that basis, its value was not includible in the assessable value of the tractor, unlike accessories or items supplied as part of the standard vehicle equipment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>