<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (7) TMI 275 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86920</link>
    <description>Imported materials and sub-systems for a Digital Electronic International Gateway Exchange were held outside Notification No. 59/88-Cus. because Sl. No. (iv) 3 covered only the complete exchange and did not expressly include sub-systems. The notification used broader wording in other entries where sub-systems were intended, so the omission here was treated as deliberate. Since the goods were themselves described as materials for expansion and as sub-systems, and were classified as parts under the tariff, no exemption could be extended by implication or presumed legislative intent. The exemption claim therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:52:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (7) TMI 275 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86920</link>
      <description>Imported materials and sub-systems for a Digital Electronic International Gateway Exchange were held outside Notification No. 59/88-Cus. because Sl. No. (iv) 3 covered only the complete exchange and did not expressly include sub-systems. The notification used broader wording in other entries where sub-systems were intended, so the omission here was treated as deliberate. Since the goods were themselves described as materials for expansion and as sub-systems, and were classified as parts under the tariff, no exemption could be extended by implication or presumed legislative intent. The exemption claim therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>