<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (7) TMI 262 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86907</link>
    <description>Imported populated printed circuit boards were not shown, by technical literature or catalogue evidence, to function as parts of a drilling machine or to fall under the claimed tariff heading. In the absence of proof supporting the asserted classification, the authorities were justified in rejecting the refund claim, and the classification as drilling machine parts was not accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (7) TMI 262 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86907</link>
      <description>Imported populated printed circuit boards were not shown, by technical literature or catalogue evidence, to function as parts of a drilling machine or to fall under the claimed tariff heading. In the absence of proof supporting the asserted classification, the authorities were justified in rejecting the refund claim, and the classification as drilling machine parts was not accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>