<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (7) TMI 257 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86902</link>
    <description>Motor running capacitors were treated as a variety of power capacitors under the relevant technical and Indian Standard usage, so functional differences, size, dimensions, or supplier descriptions did not take them outside that class. Because Notification No. 188/87-Cus. excluded power capacitors, the exemption had to be construed strictly and could not be extended beyond its plain scope. On that basis, motor running capacitors were not eligible for the exemption and fell outside the notification. The stated principle is that goods matching the ordinary technical meaning of an excluded class cannot be brought within an exemption by relying on descriptive or functional distinctions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 12:54:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123969" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (7) TMI 257 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86902</link>
      <description>Motor running capacitors were treated as a variety of power capacitors under the relevant technical and Indian Standard usage, so functional differences, size, dimensions, or supplier descriptions did not take them outside that class. Because Notification No. 188/87-Cus. excluded power capacitors, the exemption had to be construed strictly and could not be extended beyond its plain scope. On that basis, motor running capacitors were not eligible for the exemption and fell outside the notification. The stated principle is that goods matching the ordinary technical meaning of an excluded class cannot be brought within an exemption by relying on descriptive or functional distinctions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>