<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (7) TMI 256 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86901</link>
    <description>Colour video monitors were treated as standalone display units and not as television image or sound recorders or reproducers under Item No. 37BB of the erstwhile Central Excise Tariff. The classification turned on the functional distinction that a reproducer must record or reproduce image or sound, whereas the monitor only displayed signals and did not itself perform recording or reproduction. Tariff Advice No. 37/84, which addressed closed circuit television sets as a composite system, was held inapplicable to an individual video monitor. The monitors were therefore correctly classifiable under Item No. 68, and the departmental reliance on the tariff advice was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 12:29:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (7) TMI 256 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86901</link>
      <description>Colour video monitors were treated as standalone display units and not as television image or sound recorders or reproducers under Item No. 37BB of the erstwhile Central Excise Tariff. The classification turned on the functional distinction that a reproducer must record or reproduce image or sound, whereas the monitor only displayed signals and did not itself perform recording or reproduction. Tariff Advice No. 37/84, which addressed closed circuit television sets as a composite system, was held inapplicable to an individual video monitor. The monitors were therefore correctly classifiable under Item No. 68, and the departmental reliance on the tariff advice was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>