https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86893 The Tribunal found no basis for out of turn hearing where the applicant failed to show that the confiscated goods were redeemable on payment of fine under section 125 of the Customs Act, 1962. It noted that the goods were not demonstrated to fall within the scope of that redemption provision, and no precedent was produced showing that identical goods had to be released on redemption. In those circumstances, the Tribunal was not satisfied that priority treatment of the appeal was justified, and the request for out of turn hearing was rejected. en-us Tue, 08 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Aug 2011 11:54:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86893 The Tribunal found no basis for out of turn hearing where the applicant failed to show that the confiscated goods were redeemable on payment of fine under section 125 of the Customs Act, 1962. It noted that the goods were not demonstrated to fall within the scope of that redemption provision, and no precedent was produced showing that identical goods had to be released on redemption. In those circumstances, the Tribunal was not satisfied that priority treatment of the appeal was justified, and the request for out of turn hearing was rejected. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 08 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86893