<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (7) TMI 238 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86883</link>
    <description>Denial of cross-examination and a further hearing did not amount to a breach of natural justice where adequate opportunities had been given, the appellants did not avail them, and the existing test and retest material showed no prejudice. Grinding and sieving of cast iron scrap known as &quot;bhuko&quot; was held to produce a commercially distinct cast iron powder; laboratory evidence showed powder form, iron content above 1.9% by weight, and passage through a 1000 micron sieve. The process was treated as manufacture, and the product was classified as an excisable commodity under Tariff Item 25(5), with the duty demand sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 11:32:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123950" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (7) TMI 238 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86883</link>
      <description>Denial of cross-examination and a further hearing did not amount to a breach of natural justice where adequate opportunities had been given, the appellants did not avail them, and the existing test and retest material showed no prejudice. Grinding and sieving of cast iron scrap known as &quot;bhuko&quot; was held to produce a commercially distinct cast iron powder; laboratory evidence showed powder form, iron content above 1.9% by weight, and passage through a 1000 micron sieve. The process was treated as manufacture, and the product was classified as an excisable commodity under Tariff Item 25(5), with the duty demand sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>