<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (6) TMI 150 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86863</link>
    <description>Imported strips satisfying Chapter Note 1(2)&#039;s compositional criteria for stainless steel-carbon not exceeding 1.2% and chromium of 10.5% or more-had to be classified under Heading 7220.90. The presence of other alloying elements did not alter classification once the specific chapter-note definition was met, and a broader commercial understanding could not override the tariff note. The view that carbon was merely an impurity was rejected because its percentage was relevant to the steel&#039;s character. Classification under Heading 7226.99 was therefore incorrect, and the departmental classification was affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 18:10:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (6) TMI 150 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86863</link>
      <description>Imported strips satisfying Chapter Note 1(2)&#039;s compositional criteria for stainless steel-carbon not exceeding 1.2% and chromium of 10.5% or more-had to be classified under Heading 7220.90. The presence of other alloying elements did not alter classification once the specific chapter-note definition was met, and a broader commercial understanding could not override the tariff note. The view that carbon was merely an impurity was rejected because its percentage was relevant to the steel&#039;s character. Classification under Heading 7226.99 was therefore incorrect, and the departmental classification was affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>