<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (6) TMI 148 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86861</link>
    <description>Imported glossy finish stainless steel moulds were classified by reference to their identity with goods already treated as moulds in earlier Tribunal decisions. On that basis, the tariff entry for moulds prevailed over the general entry for flat-rolled steel products. The goods were held classifiable under sub-heading 8480.79 and not under sub-heading 7210.90, and the impugned order was set aside on classification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 18:07:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123928" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (6) TMI 148 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86861</link>
      <description>Imported glossy finish stainless steel moulds were classified by reference to their identity with goods already treated as moulds in earlier Tribunal decisions. On that basis, the tariff entry for moulds prevailed over the general entry for flat-rolled steel products. The goods were held classifiable under sub-heading 8480.79 and not under sub-heading 7210.90, and the impugned order was set aside on classification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>