<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (6) TMI 142 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86855</link>
    <description>Pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was waived in an appeal concerning classification of continuous computer stationery. The Tribunal treated the departmental circular and exemption notification as sufficient grounds for interim relief, and held that the appeal could not be heard until the statutory bar on hearing was crossed. Recovery of the demand was stayed during pendency of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 17:48:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (6) TMI 142 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86855</link>
      <description>Pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was waived in an appeal concerning classification of continuous computer stationery. The Tribunal treated the departmental circular and exemption notification as sufficient grounds for interim relief, and held that the appeal could not be heard until the statutory bar on hearing was crossed. Recovery of the demand was stayed during pendency of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>