<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (6) TMI 136 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86849</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order, based on the appellant&#039;s bona fide belief in the classification of goods, historical uncertainties in classification, and the applicability of exemption notifications. The decision emphasized the significance of genuine beliefs in classification matters and the influence of prior tribunal rulings on similar issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 17:16:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123916" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (6) TMI 136 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86849</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order, based on the appellant&#039;s bona fide belief in the classification of goods, historical uncertainties in classification, and the applicability of exemption notifications. The decision emphasized the significance of genuine beliefs in classification matters and the influence of prior tribunal rulings on similar issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>