https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86846 Notifications Nos. 35/88 and 34/88 dated 21-12-1988 exempted the duty differential where goods had been assessed under one heading in prevailing practice though correctly classifiable under another. Man-made fabrics found not to contain cotton were held correctly classifiable under Chapter Heading 55.08, and the notifications applied because the short levy arose from divergent assessment practice during the relevant period. The appellate order granting the exemption was therefore upheld, and the departmental challenge failed. en-us Thu, 19 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Aug 2011 17:09:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86846 Notifications Nos. 35/88 and 34/88 dated 21-12-1988 exempted the duty differential where goods had been assessed under one heading in prevailing practice though correctly classifiable under another. Man-made fabrics found not to contain cotton were held correctly classifiable under Chapter Heading 55.08, and the notifications applied because the short levy arose from divergent assessment practice during the relevant period. The appellate order granting the exemption was therefore upheld, and the departmental challenge failed. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 19 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86846