<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (6) TMI 101 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86814</link>
    <description>Notification No. 69/87-Cus. did not extend exemption to goods falling under Chapter 68 because proviso (xii) expressly excluded millstones, grindstones and other Chapter 68 articles. The goods were found to fall within that excluded chapter, so the exemption claim failed. The exclusion operated directly against the assessee&#039;s request for relief, and the appeal was rejected on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 15:17:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (6) TMI 101 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86814</link>
      <description>Notification No. 69/87-Cus. did not extend exemption to goods falling under Chapter 68 because proviso (xii) expressly excluded millstones, grindstones and other Chapter 68 articles. The goods were found to fall within that excluded chapter, so the exemption claim failed. The exclusion operated directly against the assessee&#039;s request for relief, and the appeal was rejected on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>