<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (6) TMI 98 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86811</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi, ruled in favor of the appellant, M/s. Hariram Govindram, in a case concerning the classification of plastic moulded C.O. cassettes without magnetic tape under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The Tribunal determined that the cassettes should be classified under sub-heading 3922.90 of the Tariff, based on the analysis that they were made exclusively from plastic material without any media for sound recording, aligning with previous decisions and relevant tariff provisions. The Collector of Central Excise (Appeals)&#039; decision was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 15:14:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (6) TMI 98 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86811</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi, ruled in favor of the appellant, M/s. Hariram Govindram, in a case concerning the classification of plastic moulded C.O. cassettes without magnetic tape under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The Tribunal determined that the cassettes should be classified under sub-heading 3922.90 of the Tariff, based on the analysis that they were made exclusively from plastic material without any media for sound recording, aligning with previous decisions and relevant tariff provisions. The Collector of Central Excise (Appeals)&#039; decision was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>