https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86782 The Tribunal granted a stay application in a case involving a demand of duty, penalty, and confiscation by the Collector of Central Excise, Cochin against a newsprint manufacturer using the mechanical wood pulp process. The appellant claimed benefits under Notification No. 163/67 and its amendment 79/86, asserting compliance with licensing requirements and providing technical literature supporting their process as mechanical wood pulp. The Tribunal found a strong prima facie case, waived the pre-deposit of the entire amount, and stayed recovery during the appeal based on limitations and precedents. en-us Thu, 01 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Aug 2011 14:12:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86782 The Tribunal granted a stay application in a case involving a demand of duty, penalty, and confiscation by the Collector of Central Excise, Cochin against a newsprint manufacturer using the mechanical wood pulp process. The appellant claimed benefits under Notification No. 163/67 and its amendment 79/86, asserting compliance with licensing requirements and providing technical literature supporting their process as mechanical wood pulp. The Tribunal found a strong prima facie case, waived the pre-deposit of the entire amount, and stayed recovery during the appeal based on limitations and precedents. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 01 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86782