<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 184 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86780</link>
    <description>Imported goods classified in the original assessment under Chapter heading 84.13 were treated as parts of a pump, so they did not fall within the exclusion for parts of general use under Section XV and the proviso to Notification No. 69/87-Cus. The department could not alter that accepted classification in refund proceedings without first initiating separate reclassification proceedings by show cause notice. On that basis, denial of the notification benefit was unsustainable, and the refund claim was entitled to succeed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 14:09:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123847" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 184 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86780</link>
      <description>Imported goods classified in the original assessment under Chapter heading 84.13 were treated as parts of a pump, so they did not fall within the exclusion for parts of general use under Section XV and the proviso to Notification No. 69/87-Cus. The department could not alter that accepted classification in refund proceedings without first initiating separate reclassification proceedings by show cause notice. On that basis, denial of the notification benefit was unsustainable, and the refund claim was entitled to succeed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>