<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 164 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86760</link>
    <description>Printed wrappers for safety razor blades were discussed as being classifiable under sub-heading 4823.19 of the Central Excise Tariff, rather than sub-heading 4823.90, because a Board clarification treated printed wrappers cut to size as covered by the specific tariff entry. That clarification also recognised eligibility for exemption as printed paper under Notification No. 49/87-C.E. The commentary states that the classification dispute was governed by the departmental clarification, and the competing view under sub-heading 4823.90 was not accepted, leading to acceptance of the Revenue&#039;s classification and rejection of the assessee&#039;s challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 12:36:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 164 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86760</link>
      <description>Printed wrappers for safety razor blades were discussed as being classifiable under sub-heading 4823.19 of the Central Excise Tariff, rather than sub-heading 4823.90, because a Board clarification treated printed wrappers cut to size as covered by the specific tariff entry. That clarification also recognised eligibility for exemption as printed paper under Notification No. 49/87-C.E. The commentary states that the classification dispute was governed by the departmental clarification, and the competing view under sub-heading 4823.90 was not accepted, leading to acceptance of the Revenue&#039;s classification and rejection of the assessee&#039;s challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>