<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 163 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86759</link>
    <description>Additional excise duty was held not leviable on TV sets exported out of India under bond. The Tribunal relied on the departmental circular clarifying that the levy was intended in lieu of licence fee for domestic use of TV sets, and not for goods exported outside India. On that basis, the demand was found unsustainable and was set aside, with relief granted to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 12:30:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 163 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86759</link>
      <description>Additional excise duty was held not leviable on TV sets exported out of India under bond. The Tribunal relied on the departmental circular clarifying that the levy was intended in lieu of licence fee for domestic use of TV sets, and not for goods exported outside India. On that basis, the demand was found unsustainable and was set aside, with relief granted to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86759</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>