<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 247 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86754</link>
    <description>Modvat credit was available only from the date of a valid declaration under the scheme, so inputs received before that declaration did not qualify. Transitional relief for stock inputs could be claimed only through the prescribed procedure, and no such request was made. The denial of credit for the pre-declaration period was therefore upheld, and no further relief was available in respect of inputs lying in stock.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 12:03:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=123821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 247 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86754</link>
      <description>Modvat credit was available only from the date of a valid declaration under the scheme, so inputs received before that declaration did not qualify. Transitional relief for stock inputs could be claimed only through the prescribed procedure, and no such request was made. The denial of credit for the pre-declaration period was therefore upheld, and no further relief was available in respect of inputs lying in stock.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=86754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>